WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court ruled Thursday that authorities do not have to provide a quick hearing when they seize cars and other property used in drug crimes, even when the property belongs to so-called innocent owners.
By a 6-3 vote, the justices rejected the claims of two Alabama women who had to wait more than a year for their cars to be returned. Police had stopped the cars when they were being driven by other people and, after finding drugs, seized the vehicles.
Civil forfeiture allows authorities to take someone’s property, without having to prove that it has been used for illicit purposes. Critics of the practice describe it as “legalized theft.”
Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote for the conservative majority that a civil forfeiture hearing to determine whether an owner will lose the property permanently must be timely. But he said the Constitution does not also require a separate hearing about whether police may keep cars or other property in the meantime.
Amy Robach says she never got an engagement ring from ex
China making its mark in global services trade
U.S. urged to stop harassing, interrogating Chinese students entering country
Xi highlights upgrading of opening
Kentucky congressman expects no voter fallout for his role in attempt to oust House speaker
Xi sends congratulatory message to 37th AU Summit
Emergency flying force to the rescue
MNCs keen on green ties in transport, logistics
Mauricio Pochettino leaves Chelsea after one year as manager of the Premier League club
Xinhua Headlines: Chinese, Nauruan Presidents Hold Talks for 1st Time Since Resuming Ties
A Canadian serial killer who brought victims to a pig farm is hospitalized after a prison assault
New focus will bolster housing market